On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 14:32:53 -0800, Rudy Canoza says...
None of that happened. Every word about NASA & NOAA "faking" data is a lie
- completely debunked.
By whoM... and cite it, or you're a liar.
Since YOU won't do ANY fucking research, because you KNOW it will debunk your
"completely debunked" bullshit, I'll do it for you.
Poor lonely wittle Wudy.
Can't and won't cite his "completely debunked" statement, so he lies.
Rudy's lies snipped.
Top NASA Climate 'Data Fraudster' Named & Shamed
NASA's top climate scientist singled out as architect of the biggest data fraud
of all time. Anti-science con artist Gavin Schmidt is named and shamed for
deliberately falsifying global temperatures since 2000 and DOUBLING the actual
level of warming to fit a political agenda.
Respected climate analyst, Tony Heller, spotted on President Donald Trump's
radar, may have provided the administration with compelling evidence of a
criminal fraud. This would be fitting vindication for Trump who has for years
dismissed man-made global warming as "a hoax."
Heller has been on the attack against Schmidt (director of NASA's Goddard
Institute for Space Studies, which studies the changing atmosphere) since he
took over from former top dog James Hansen who retired in April 2013. Skeptics
believe fellow climate alarmist activist Hansen groomed Schmidt for the job.
But Schmidt has been outspoken about what Trump can do to stop him asserting it
won't be simple for the U.S. president to purge federal climate research during
his tenure. In an interview with Business Insider (Nov. 22 2016) Schmidt said:
"Chopping off science just to prevent people from talking about climate change
won't work. You need science for hazards, for weather forecasting, and climate
comes along for the ride."
But Gavin Schmidt may find he is in the cross hairs and tossed from the climate
gravy train once Trump and his science advisers take a cold, hard look at the
damning evidence Heller presents.
If prosecutors find probable cause then Schmidt could even face federal RICO
charges. This is because he has personally become enriched from climate
policies that have cost taxpayers trillions. Not only Schmidt but a tight-knit
cabal of government researchers have benefited from the alleged scam which
first gained public notoriety after the Climategate email leaks (2009).
Posting a series of telling graphs on his site, realclimatescience.com Heller
"There was plenty of data tampering to the temperature record prior to the year
2000, but since the year 2000 the tampering has become very systematic and
cynical. Gavin Schmidt at NASA has more than doubled global warming by altering
his own temperature data since 2000."
Heller's series of graphs (below) allows readers to make up their own minds.
Note the spectacular hockey stick of data tampering since the year 2000.
This presents a huge problem for Gavin, because satellite temperatures show
little or no warming since the year 2000.
Furthermore, Gavin is continuously tampering with data to make his hockey stick
of temperature fraud even worse. Note the upwards change since before the
Satellite data from RSS shows earth cooling at the fastest rate on record over
the last ten months This graph shows the current temperature anomaly minus the
anomaly ten months earlier.
Carl Mears at RSS has come to Gavin's rescue however, by telling people not to
use his lower troposphere data, and instead use his TTT data set which reaches
all the way up to 50,000 feet - where temperatures are about minus 100 degrees.
Carl's new TTT data set shows a lot more warming than the lower troposphere
We see the same systematic hockey stick of data alteration, in an effort to
make satellite data match Gavin's altered temperature data.
Are Carl Mears' changes legitimate? A good way to test them is to compare
versus radiosonde data of the troposphere. Unfortunately NOAA has done exactly
the same data tampering to the radiosonde data. Their original radiosonde data
showed only 0.2C warming since 1958, so they altered it to produce 0.8C
Once again, we see the same hockey stick of data tampering to bring radiosonde
data in line with Gavin's highly altered temperature data.
And NOAA has done exactly the same thing with US temperature data. It didn't
match the altered global temperature data, so NOAA altered US temperatures to
make them match fake global temperatures.
Again, we see the same hockey stick of data tampering.
All of the data sets have been massively tampered with since the year 2000, in
an effort to bring them in line with the tampered NASA data set. And this
doesn't even include the massive tampering done prior to the year 2000 to erase
the 1940's temperature spike, and post-1940's global cooling.
All of this data tampering was committed intentionally, and in collusion
Climate science depends on the accuracy of this data, which is neither accurate
nor legitimate. Global warming is the biggest science scam in history.
Gavin Schmidt, has history of belittling skeptical scientists, suppressing
debate, condoning making climate data "impenetrable" and many of his scientific
claims and his website RealClimate.org, have been harshly criticized by
scientists from around the world.
Gavin Schmidt's history:
NASA's Gavin Schmidt promotes hiding data!? I would simply put the whole CRU
database (in an as-impenetrable-as-possible form' - Warmist AGU gave a $25,000
award to Gavin Schmidt being the 'best climate communicator in the world'
Physicist Dr. Motl rips Schmidt: 'So if you want to be the best climate science
communicator in the world, you have to release the data in an as-impenetrable-
as-possible form. ;-)'
Prof. Pielke Jr. 'I think we can get past the lie - and it was a lie - that
these activist scientists, in the words of RealClimate.org's Gavin Schmidt, are
not taking a political stand'
Israeli Astrophysicist Nir Shaviv has also been critical. "The aim of
[Schmidt's] RealClimate.org is not to engage a sincere scientific debate. Their
aim is to post a reply full of a straw man so their supporters can claim that
your point 'has been refuted by real scientists at RealClimate.org,'" Shaviv's
website reported. Shaviv, who calls the website "Wishfulclimate.org," noted
that the "writers (at RealClimaet.org) try again and again to concoct what
appears to be deep critiques against skeptic arguments, but end up doing a very
shallow job. All in the name of saving the world. How gallant of them."
Schmidt on Climategate:
RealClimate.org's Gavin Schmidt says skeptics are full of 'paranoia' and
Climategate 'has allowed the nutters to control the agenda'
A carbon tax will change NOTHING, other than the wealth of politicians and
countries who beg us for money. THAT was the purpose of the Paris Accord...
the ONLY purpose.
Funny... when the government no longer pays for bogus money-grabbing data, the
truth comes out.
It's "weather's not climate" when the temperatures don't agree with what ultra-
religious AGW screechers have to say... but when it does, it's climate change.
"It's all about money in the end. Keeping the Gravy Train running."
Australia Weather Bureau Caught Tampering With Climate Numbers
Climate Change Scientists Caught Tampering With Data to Show Rising Sea Levels
"NOAA And NASA Corrected Historical Temperature Data And Fabricated
"NASA Made Efforts To Discredit Their Own Satellite Data"
"NASA Refused To Give Data And Information Requested By The US
House Of Representatives Science, Space And Technology Committee"
"NASA And NOAA Caught In Climate Data Manipulation"
"NASA Dramatically Altered US Temperatures After The Year 2000"
"Spectacularly Poor Climate Science At NASA"
"NASA/NOAA Mislead, Deceive and Lie About 'Hottest Year' Claim - Concede
2014 NOT "Hottest Year"
"Climate Fraud: NASA's Recent Global Warming "Corrections" Equal a +95.0°C
Per Century Trend"
"And we're like... the world is going to end in 12 years if we don't address
AOC's Top Aide Admits Green New Deal About The Economy, Not Climate
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's chief of staff recently admitted that the
Green New Deal was not conceived as an effort to deal with climate change,
but instead a "how-do-you-change-the-entire economy thing" -- a remark
likely to fuel Republican claims that the deal is nothing more than a
thinly veiled socialist takeover of the U.S. economy.
"The interesting thing about the Green New Deal is it wasn't originally a
climate thing at all," Saikat Chakrabarti said in May, according to The
UN Official Admits That Climate Change Used As A Ruse To Control The
"Unequal Distribution of Wealth and Power" Causes Climate Change
U.N. Official Reveals Real Reason Behind Warming Scare
Another Climate Alarmist Admits Real Motive Behind Warming Scare
United Nations Official Admits the Purpose of the Global Warming Hoax is
to Destroy Capitalism